Archive for the ‘Indiana General Assembly’ Category

8th CD: Courier & Press on Trent Van Haaften

Monday, March 8th, 2010

Over the weekend, Eric Bradner of the Evansville Courier & Press penned a profile piece on 8th Congressional District candidate Trent Van Haaften. Taking a look at the legislative career of the moderate Democrat, players from both parties were quick to praise the work of the former Posey County prosecutor.

But as he leaves behind a Statehouse in which his star was on the rise among Democratic leaders, the question is, will such a campaign resonate?

The House Public Policy Committee, which Van Haaften chairs, is assigned bills related to the regulation of drugs, gambling and alcohol, as well as crime and sentencing. He won praise from fellow committee members for his handling of those issues.

“I think Trent’s been a phenomenal committee chairman,” said Rep. Matt Bell of Avilla, the top-ranking Republican on the committee.

Bell said on that legislative panel, “we are able to work in a bipartisan fashion. These are not issues that fall on party lines. And he’s promoted that culture of exchange.”

Grandstanding 101

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

You’d think, given the fact that state lawmakers will reconvene next month to pass a state budget after failing to do so in the regular session, that Senate Republicans would be hard at work meeting with the Guv to work out a GOP-backed plan, especially considering their last try netted zero Republican votes in the Indiana House.

Instead, they’re sending letters about something over which they have absolutely, positively no control and that doesn’t, in any way, affect the daily operation of state government. And Republicans wonder why they’re headed for the wilderness among moderate voters?

Thirty-one Republican state senators have asked U.S. Sens. Evan Bayh and Dick Lugar to oppose the nomination of an Indiana University law professor nominated by President Barack Obama for a senior position in the U.S. Department of Justice.

In a letter May 15, the state senators said Dawn Johnsen’s advocacy of abortion rights “is more than simply pro-choice — she is pro-choice in an extremely radical way.”

The letter, citing statements and writings by Johnsen, asks Bayh, a Democrat, and Lugar, a Republican, to oppose Johnsen’s nomination to be assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel in the Justice Department.

“It’s a statement from a very strong pro-life caucus,” said Indiana Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne. “It is not based on the fact she is pro-choice, it is based on the fact that she is radically so.”

Johnsen, in response to an e-mail from The Associated Press seeking comment, replied with an e-mail saying that as a nominee she was not to talk with the media.

White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage said Johnsen “will bring unquestioned integrity and a commitment to non-partisan interpretation of the law to the Office of Legal Counsel, and we’re pleased that both of Indiana’s senators have expressed support for her nomination.”

Skillman Includes Her Boss In Budget Breakdown Blame Game

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

Lt. Gov. Becky Skillman was in Northwest Indiana yesterday talking about how great it is that Indiana is getting a bunch of federal stimulus money provided by the leadership of President Barack Obama and Democrats in Congress. Okay, she didn’t say that last part.

Skillman, who’s widely rumored to be considering a run for the top job in 2012, also keynoted the Porter County Lincoln Day dinner while she was in the region. She had no shortage of blame to pass around to explain why we still don’t have a state budget. The Times of Northwest Indiana reports:

Skillman said the failure of the Indiana General Assembly to agree on a two-year budget was caused by tough economic times that have reduced tax collections and confused economic forecasters who legislators lean on to provide reliable numbers to spend on state services, primarily education.

She said she blames a lack of communication in the final hours of the General Assembly between Gov. Mitch Daniels and legislative leaders.

Interesting that she’d include Daniels in that mix. It’s clear to any observer that the Guv’s first-term, arm-twisting tactics aren’t going to work now that he’s a second-term lame duck. Perhaps Skillman doesn’t mind throwing him under the bus a little bit if it means she has a better shot at running in three years.

After all, Skillman came from the Indiana Senate, so she’s seen this rodeo play out more than once. It would be understandable if she was frustrated watching Daniels hide under his desk the entire session, leaving fellow Republicans and Democratic leaders trying to avoid the ever-moving target of his veto pen.

Guv Under The Gun Over Budget Leadership

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

After an entire legislative session of ducking and covering, Mitch Daniels now faces some tough questions from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle about his ability to put a state budget proposal (read: non-moving target) on the table. The Fort Wayne Journal Gazette reports:

The majority legislative caucuses agree on one thing after another dismal month of revenues and a looming special session – it’s time for Gov. Mitch Daniels to step up and craft his own version of a two-year budget.

“I’ve invited the governor to tell us what his solution is because obviously we haven’t met his standards,” said Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville. “We need to hear more from him.”

House Speaker Pat Bauer, D-South Bend, agrees, saying “he needs to come out with a budget – not just vague references. Numbers, numbers, numbers. Then we can work on it from there.”

Daniels, meanwhile, has made no decisions on when the special session will happen or the course it will take.

“I still think the appropriate role is the one I adopted at the State of the State speech and every single day through Wednesday, which was to say ‘here is the boundary condition.’ We need to protect the reserves and leave the legislature the freedom, give them the respect, to impose their own priorities on it,” he said.

“But if they would prefer a more directive approach, then that is an option.”

The flurry of statements came Monday after Daniels announced state tax collections missed projections by $255 million in April.

Odd that the guy who, in a prior session, accused Democrats of “car-bombing” his legislative agenda suddenly has no legislative agenda. Could it be that he finds himself with no power to twist arms and thus no power to lead? Daniels, after all, has ever been one to diplomatically mete out compromises among all the players at the table.

Oh, and what happened to the talking points about how his financial genius put our state back on the right economic track? Not so long ago, we were an island of growth in the Midwest. Now he points to a downward arrow on a budget chart and pleads for fiscal responsibility? Sorry, Guv, but you can’t have it both ways.

The Session’s Biggest Loser?

Monday, May 4th, 2009

This Indianapolis Star headline says it all: “Daniels’ legislative winning streak ends.”

Gov. Mitch Daniels, known for hitting legislative home runs in his first four years in office, struck out this year.

He didn’t get any of the local government reforms he sought. Lawmakers failed to pass a budget — and even if they had, it wasn’t the budget he wanted. And his one parameter for an unemployment compensation fix — cuts in benefits — isn’t in the bill legislators passed.

Daniels, who in his first term liked to punctuate each legislative season with a scorecard showing his wins, didn’t bother Thursday when he met with reporters to reflect on the session’s carnage.

Asked about what he’d accomplished this session, Daniels said: “Well, we had the school discipline bill.”

That relatively minor bill, aimed at protecting teachers from frivolous lawsuits, hardly compares with the kind of success Daniels is used to, including the “Major Moves” Indiana Toll Road lease in 2006 and property tax reforms last year. Which is why Daniels immediately added that he didn’t “quarrel” with the poor assessment of this year’s session.

Gov. Daniels’ Failed Leadership

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Indiana Democratic Party Chair Dan Parker has issued the following statement in response to Gov. Mitch Daniels’ lack of leadership this legislative session:

For four months, Mitch Daniels has been hiding under his desk, periodically emerging to tell lawmakers he’s not interested in offering any leadership on key issues this session.

Unemployment fix? Not my problem, Daniels told lawmakers. CIB bailout? Don’t look to me for guidance, he said.

Last night, Daniels’ failure to lead resulted in no budget passing: a budget agreed to by Senate Republicans. Now we’re heading into a special session that Mitch Daniels could have prevented.

He didn’t put any solutions on the table. He didn’t broker any compromises. He did not bring people together. He just embraced the current mantra of national Republicans: No, no, no, no, no.

Workers Gather At Statehouse To Rally For Unemployment Benefits

Monday, April 27th, 2009

Thousands of workers gathered this morning at the Indiana Statehouse to send the clear message to lawmakers that unemployment benefits, especially in this economy, should not be cut. The Associated Press reports:

Construction workers are gathering in Indianapolis for a rally at the Indiana Statehouse to protest proposed cuts in unemployment insurance benefits.

Republicans who control the Senate have proposed a plan that would increase employer taxes, reduce benefits for most jobless claimants and tighten eligibility standards. They and Democrats who control the House are trying to negotiate a compromise.

Sheet Metal Workers Local 20 business manager Jay Potesta says that under the GOP plan a worker who is injured on the job would not be eligible for unemployment compensation.

The rally was scheduled for midday Monday.

The state’s unemployment insurance fund has been paying out hundreds of millions of dollars more in benefits than it has been collecting in employer taxes.

Much Ado About Tax Caps That Already Exist

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

House Republicans aren’t fooling anyone with their melodramatic response to the fact that the state has bigger issues to deal with this year than embedding existing property tax caps into the Indiana Constitution.

Democrats have urged caution, rightly pointing out that we have no way of knowing what effect the caps will have on local governments until after this year. But Republicans know the caps are the only thing they can talk about in the absence of a plan to bail out the state’s bankrupt unemployment fund, fix our economy or help hard-working Hoosier families get back on their feet.

Here’s what the Indianapolis Star’s Matt Tully had to say about House Speaker Pat Bauer’s decision to delay a vote on putting the tax caps into the Constitution until next year:

And so, critics are calling him everything from arrogant to the taxpayers’ worst nightmare. House Republican leader Brian Bosma said Bauer “ignored the overwhelming majority of Hoosier taxpayers” by blocking the tax-cap resolution. In a display of the melodramatic rhetoric you start to hear at the end of every General Assembly session, Bosma added: “I feel sorry for Hoosier taxpayers.”

Sorry or not, Bauer was right. He was right not to be swayed by polls, PR gimmicks or anti-tax tea parties. He was right to slow down a process that was moving too fast.

Dems’ Plan Would Preserve Workers’ Benefits

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

House Democrats have proposed an unemployment insurance fund plan that wouldn’t hurt the unemployed Hoosiers who rely on the program to get them through tough times. Republicans, on the other hand, had put a plan on the table that would have cut some payments and eliminated benefits altogether for certain types of workers. The Associated Press reports:

Employers would pay higher taxes under a revised proposal Indiana House Democrats presented on Monday as a way to fix Indiana’s bankrupt unemployment insurance fund.

The taxes employers would pay into the fund overall would be higher than House Democrats originally proposed, at least initially, and the new plan still would not cut benefits paid to the jobless.

Republicans who control the Senate have proposed a plan that they said was balanced because it would increase employer taxes, reduce benefits for most jobless claimants and tighten eligibility standards. The parties are trying to negotiate a compromise by the April 29 deadline for adjourning this year’s session.

Rep. David Niezgodski, D-South Bend, said the revised House Democrat plan would fix a fund that has been paying out hundreds of millions of dollars more than it has been collecting in employer taxes. The fund has borrowed more than $700 million from the federal government to stay solvent, a figure that could top $1.2 billion by year’s end.

Mitch Daniels: Completely Irrelevant?

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Right before the 2008 general election, Gov. Mitch Daniels aired a television ad stating that he’d never run for another office.

He won in a landslide, but are his words coming back to haunt him?

Consider this: Before the legislative session, Daniels got on board with local government reform and continued to push the property tax caps he talked about during the campaign. With little to no success.

He’s been hiding under his desk on the big-ticket issues like the bankrupt unemployment insurance fund and Indiana’s ailing economy.

And last week, State Sen. Luke Kenley and other Republicans proposed a state budget that relies on about $2 billion in federal stimulus money. Daniels condemned it, but the GOP members did the political equivalent of shrugging their shoulders and walking off.

The fact of the matter, if you look at the evidence, is that Daniels is a self-basted lame duck. No one particularly cares what he thinks, and no one is paying any attention to his agenda.

He never developed any real leadership skills or political coattails during his first term: Why should anyone in either party give him the time of day?

The pundits already have turned their attention to 2012, so it looks like we’re in for four years of a Governor who just doesn’t matter.